Vivek Ramaswamy

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the legal proceedings involving Michael Cohen and the implications for political figures and campaigns. It expresses a strong opinion on the legitimacy of the trial and its impact on political dynamics.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement may harm reputations by dismissing the trial as a 'hoax' without substantiated evidence, potentially undermining trust in judicial processes. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy of individuals by not disclosing sensitive personal information, but it could be seen as lacking respect for the dignity of the parties involved by labeling the trial a 'hoax'.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy; it polarizes by dismissing opposing views without a detailed argument. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in dialogue but does so in a manner that might not be constructive, as it dismisses opposing views without thorough consideration. [-1]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   There is no indication of acknowledgment or correction of mistakes, as the statement presents a one-sided view without considering counterarguments.
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The use of the term 'hoax' could be seen as using influence to discredit legal proceedings, which may not contribute positively to society. [-1]
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement uses the platform to express a strong opinion, which is a right under free speech, but it may not be done with full responsibility and integrity if the information is not accurately represented. [-1]