Reposted by Jake Tapper
Fayez Al-Dwairi I اللواء فايز الدويري
@FayezAldwairi
·
462d
The statement by the Jordanian ex-general and Al-Jazeera’s main Gaza war analyst is a clear example of public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about historical and religious perceptions that have societal and political implications. The statement is highly critical and controversial, focusing on the perceived attitudes and religious texts of the Jewish community.
- The statement does harm by promoting stereotypes and negative generalizations about an entire religious group, which can incite hostility and misunderstanding. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement disrespects the dignity of the Jewish community by attributing negative traits to them collectively, which can be seen as a form of harassment or hate speech. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it fosters division and animosity by using accusatory and inflammatory language. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement fails to engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses ad hominem arguments by attacking the character of the Jewish people based on religious texts, rather than engaging in a factual debate or discussion. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the speaker's influence to spread divisive and harmful views, which does not contribute to the betterment of society but rather exacerbates tensions and conflicts. [-2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.