Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
5/14/2024, 10:37:52 PM
X
In reply to:
eswarpr
@eswarpr
·
609d
@GaryMarcus It’s clearly zero sum AI vs human
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
609d
Oops.
Sam Altman
@sama
·
1052d
a new version of moore’s law that could start soon:

the amount of intelligence in the universe doubles every 18 months

The statement '@eswarpr Doesn’t have to be. We should strive for augmentation rather than replacement.' is a response in a conversation about artificial intelligence and its implications on human roles. This statement engages in public discourse by addressing the societal issue of AI development and its impact on humanity, suggesting a collaborative rather than competitive approach between AI and humans.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement promotes a non-harmful approach to AI development, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By advocating for augmentation over replacement, the statement encourages understanding and compassion towards the potential benefits of AI for human society. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages constructively without personal attacks, focusing on the idea rather than the individual, thus upholding respectful and constructive dialogue. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The suggestion to focus on augmentation implies using influence to promote societal betterment through thoughtful AI integration. [+1]