Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement discusses the credibility and motives of Michael Cohen, a key witness in Donald Trump's New York criminal trial, highlighting the scrutiny he faced from prosecutors. This statement is part of public discourse as it engages with a significant legal and political issue involving public figures.
- The statement reports on legal proceedings and does not appear to cause harm but rather informs about the judicial process. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the privacy and dignity of the individuals involved by sticking to facts related to the trial without unnecessary personal details. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of the legal challenges and scrutiny faced by a witness in a high-profile trial. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism by reporting on the challenging questions directed at Cohen's credibility, which is a critical aspect of legal proceedings. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement acknowledges the contentious nature of the witness's credibility, which is a crucial part of correcting public understanding of the trial. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- By informing the public about the trial's developments, the statement uses its influence to enhance societal understanding of legal processes. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds principles of free speech by disseminating information about a public trial, contributing to public discourse responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.