Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
5/14/2024, 11:23:54 PM
X
In reply to:
Bryan Wade
@stale2000
·
609d
@GaryMarcus @tegmark From your article: "In 2029, AI will not be able to watch a movie and tell you accurately what is going on".

What?

Don't we almost have this, like right now?

Maybe not in a single 1 shot go, but video vision models exist and could be put together.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
610d
@tegmark I offered Elon a related bet here and stand by this (what I should have clarified there though was that it has to be one general model to count as AGI, not three+ separate models):

https://garymarcus.substack.com/…
Max Tegmark
@tegmark
·
610d
To those of you who claiming that smarter-than-human AI is decades away, what *specific tasks* are you willing to bet me that AI won't be able to do within 5 years?
Rowan Cheung
@rowancheung
·
610d
OpenAI just announced ChatGPT's new real-time conversational chat.

The model can understand both audio AND video, and can even detect emotion in your voice.

This is insane.

The statement in question is part of a broader discussion on the capabilities and future of artificial intelligence (AI), specifically addressing the potential for AI to understand and interpret complex scenarios such as movies. The statement provides a critical perspective on the current state of AI technology, emphasizing the limitations of new systems in terms of hallucination and representational inadequacies. This contributes to the public discourse on AI development and its implications.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to clarify misconceptions about AI capabilities, contributing to a more informed public understanding and potentially preventing harm that might arise from overestimating current AI technology. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of others by maintaining a factual and analytical approach, avoiding any derogatory or disrespectful language. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By providing a critical analysis of AI capabilities, the statement fosters a deeper understanding of the technology, which is beneficial for public comprehension and policy making. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by highlighting specific shortcomings in AI technology, which can guide future research and development efforts. [+2]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The author acknowledges the temporal context of the referenced article, showing a commitment to accuracy and the correction of potential misunderstandings. [+1]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the platform to discuss significant technological and societal issues, contributing positively to the discourse on AI and its future impact. [+2]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds principles of free speech by sharing a viewpoint that may counter some prevailing narratives, thereby enriching the public debate. [+1]