Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 57
5/15/2024, 2:13:49 AM
X
In reply to:
laurie 🙊
@lauriefitzherb5
·
422d
@marwilliamson @WeTheAngry @chrislhayes A presidential campaign is not a book tour. Ha ha. Ha ha. Ha Ha. Marianne, your's might not have been.

The great thing about book tour is presidential campaign funds pay a $450,000 salary plus expenses to the candidate.
🤣😂🤣😂

Dreams from my Father.
The Courage to be Free.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
422d
@WeTheAngry @chrislhayes Really? Do tell me the name of the book I ever mentioned at my political talks! If I was selling a book wouldn’t I have mentioned its name? Having published 15 books, I kind of know what a book tour is. A presidential campaign is not a book tour. One disgruntled staff member who…
Andrea
@WeTheAngry
·
422d
@marwilliamson @chrislhayes Marianne, I used to have so much respect for you. Your campaign was nothing more than a book campaign and many hard-working, sincere people worked diligently for you till they realized and then quit. Be the light you teach, I believe you have much to offer when sincere.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
422d
My God the gaslighting. Biden had a challenger @chrislhayes and it was journalistic malpractice for MSNBC to blacklist that candidate because YOU didn’t want her heard. MSNBC etc. has no right to say who is and who is not a serious candidate, particularly when I was the only one…
Chris Hayes
@chrislhayes
·
422d
@AsteadWH I'll confess I'm a little unclear how MSNBC is the reason that...the incumbent President didn't face a serious primary challenge. It's very hard to do ! Lots of people could have if they wanted to. The last one didn't face one either even though polling was pretty rough

The statement in question is a response in a Twitter conversation about campaign funding and the nature of political campaigns versus book tours. The user is clarifying that no campaign funds were used to pay them, countering an implication or accusation made in the previous messages.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to clarify misinformation or assumptions about the use of campaign funds, which helps prevent the spread of potentially harmful rumors. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of others by addressing the claims directly without attacking the individuals involved. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The user's response promotes understanding by clarifying their personal experience with campaign finance, contributing to a more informed discussion. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by correcting a misconception without escalating the conversation into personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The user acknowledges the discussion and provides a correction to what they perceive as a misunderstanding or misrepresentation of facts. [+1]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By clarifying the use of campaign funds, the user uses their platform to enhance transparency and honesty in discussions about political campaigning. [+1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech by participating in a public discussion and providing their perspective on the issue. [+1]