The statement discusses Google's approach to addressing the imperfections of generative AI technologies, specifically noting that the company's executives frequently mentioned 'AI' but did not address the term 'hallucination' or other errors associated with AI. This critique implies a lack of transparency or acknowledgment of the limitations of AI technology by Google.
- The statement aims to highlight a potential issue of transparency and accountability in how a major tech company discusses its AI technology, which could impact public trust and informed decision-making. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of others by focusing on the actions of the company rather than targeting individuals, maintaining a professional tone without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By bringing attention to the issue of AI imperfections, the statement encourages a more informed and nuanced public understanding and dialogue about AI technologies. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to critique a major company's approach to AI, potentially influencing public and corporate policy towards greater transparency. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.