In reply to:
calwerz
@calwerz
·
610d
The statement '@calwerz both' is a concise response to a question about whether a perceived deficiency in a system's response is due to 'missing world knowledge or missing intelligence or both.' This statement is part of a broader conversation about the capabilities and limitations of artificial intelligence systems, specifically in the context of their comparison to human intelligence and their role in the development of AGI (Artificial General Intelligence).
- The statement does no harm as it is a neutral contribution to a technical discussion. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the dignity of others by maintaining a professional tone without any derogatory or disrespectful language. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying that both elements (world knowledge and intelligence) might be lacking, contributing to a nuanced view of AI capabilities. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages constructively by adding to the dialogue about AI's limitations and capabilities. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement is straightforward and does not involve any errors or misstatements that would require correction. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- It uses influence responsibly by contributing thoughtfully to a public discussion on an important technological topic. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by participating in an open exchange of ideas about AI. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.