Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 57
5/15/2024, 11:40:40 AM
X
In reply to:
Meredith Whittaker
@mer__edith
·
421d
This is also why the issue of AI, AI hype, etc. CANNOT be separated from concerns around privacy and expression.
Meredith Whittaker
@mer__edith
·
421d
This is incredibly dangerous. It lays the path for centralized, device-level client side scanning.

From detecting 'scams' it's a short step to "detecting patterns commonly associated w/ seeking reproductive care" or "commonly associated w/ providing LGBTQ resources" or…
Made by Google
@madebygoogle
·
422d
We're testing a new feature that uses Gemini Nano to provide real-time alerts during a call if it detects conversation patterns commonly associated with scams. This protection all happens on-device so your conversation stays private to you. More to come later this year! #GoogleIO

The statement '@mer__edith I agree' is a brief affirmation in response to concerns about privacy and expression related to AI technologies. The conversation addresses significant societal issues such as privacy, the potential misuse of AI in surveillance, and the implications for marginalized communities. The statement itself, however, is minimal and does not substantively add to the discourse but shows agreement with the preceding critical analysis of AI technology's potential risks.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm as it is a simple agreement with a previous statement that raises valid concerns about privacy and surveillance. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of others by aligning with a perspective that is cautious about potential misuse of technology that could affect personal freedoms. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    While the statement itself does not actively promote understanding or compassion, it supports a viewpoint that does, which indirectly contributes to a more informed discussion on the topic. [+0.5]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence minimally but positively by agreeing with a cautionary stance on the use of AI, which could be considered a use of influence for societal betterment. [+0.5]