Reposted by Gary Marcus
Knowledge in Crisis
@knowledgecrisis
·
651d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the future and ethical considerations of artificial intelligence (AI). The statement reflects on a talk by Gary Marcus, a prominent figure in AI, and discusses his views on the current state and future directions of AI technologies, which is a substantive engagement with a public issue.
- The statement does no harm and positively highlights the speaker's approach to AI, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of Gary Marcus and others in the AI field, avoiding any form of harassment or derogatory comments. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By recommending Gary Marcus's talks and highlighting the importance of his views, the statement promotes understanding and compassion towards different perspectives in AI. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by pointing out issues within the AI industry without resorting to personal attacks, focusing on the content of the talk. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to recommend educational talks that could lead to a better understanding of AI, thus contributing positively to society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement responsibly uses the platform to share and promote insightful views on AI, aligning with the principle of responsible use of free speech. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.