In reply to:
Mickey Vorvoreanu (Dr. V)
@mihaela_v
·
611d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
611d
Paul Freeman
@realpaulfreeman
·
611d
The statement by @mihaela_v engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of voice characteristics in AI voice assistants, such as Alexa and Siri. It responds to a broader conversation about the design choices in AI technology and their implications. The statement highlights the ease of choosing alternatives to problematic features, suggesting a preference for thoughtful design in technology that aligns with ethical considerations.
- The statement promotes a thoughtful approach to technology design, aiming to minimize harm by considering the implications of design choices. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the dignity of users by advocating for alternatives that might prevent discomfort or dissatisfaction with AI voice assistants. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The comment contributes to a compassionate approach by acknowledging past complaints and suggesting improvements. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages constructively by adding to a discussion on AI design choices, encouraging consideration of user-friendly and ethical alternatives. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence in the conversation to advocate for better design practices in AI, which could lead to societal benefits if such practices are adopted. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.