Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement discusses CNN's debate qualifying standards, specifically mentioning a rule about a candidate's eligibility based on appearing on a sufficient number of state ballots. It then comments on RFK Jr.'s inability to meet this criterion, suggesting he will not be eligible for the debate.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm but is dismissive in tone, which could be seen as slightly negative. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing only on public, professional criteria for debate eligibility. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks a tone of understanding or compassion, focusing instead on the factual ineligibility of a candidate.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- While not engaging in a personal attack, the statement's dismissive tone could be seen as not fully constructive. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement informs about a public process (debate eligibility) which could be seen as contributing to societal understanding of electoral processes. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.