Reposted by Ayanna Pressley
The statement addresses the effectiveness and legal implications of ShotSpotter technology, a gunshot detection system, and acknowledges the actions of specific senators who are advocating for an investigation into its funding by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). This statement is a form of public discourse as it engages with issues of public safety, civil rights, and government accountability.
- The statement aims to highlight concerns about the technology without causing harm, focusing on its effectiveness and legal implications. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of others and does not engage in harassment or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By raising awareness about potential civil rights violations, the statement promotes understanding and empathy for those who might be adversely affected by the technology. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of ShotSpotter technology and the use of federal funds, inviting dialogue on its implications. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a review of ShotSpotter by DHS, aiming to better society by ensuring technology funded by the government is both effective and lawful. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement responsibly uses the platform to discuss a significant public issue, contributing to the discourse on public safety and civil rights. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.