Reposted by Ayanna Pressley
The statement involves public discourse as it addresses a significant public issue concerning civil rights and the use of technology in law enforcement. The call for an investigation by public officials into the implications of ShotSpotter technology on civil rights engages with societal concerns about equality, justice, and the appropriate use of government resources.
- The statement aims to prevent potential harm caused by the misuse of technology, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of communities potentially affected by over-policing, supporting the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By addressing concerns of civil rights violations, the statement promotes understanding and empathy for affected communities. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The call for an investigation is a form of constructive criticism of current practices, aiming for dialogue and improvement rather than personal attacks. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the influence of public officials to advocate for the betterment of society by ensuring technology is used fairly. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement responsibly uses the platform of public office to engage in free speech that addresses public concerns with integrity. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.