The statement 'Missed the message — sorry. DMed you' is a brief and personal response to a previous message regarding a serious issue of an American citizen detained in China. The tone is apologetic for missing the initial contact, and the intent seems to be to move the conversation to a private channel for further discussion.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not directly engage with the public issue of wrongful detention but acknowledges the missed communication, which is a minor aspect of handling the discourse.
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement respects the dignity of the original poster by acknowledging the missed message and attempting to rectify it by moving to a direct message, which could be seen as a respectful and private way to handle sensitive discussions.
[+1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement is neutral and does not engage in any form of cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
[+1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.While the statement itself does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion directly towards the issue, the move to take the conversation to a private channel might be intended to address the matter more seriously and personally.
Principle 5:
I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.The statement acknowledges a mistake (missing the message) and attempts to correct it by initiating a private conversation.
[+1]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The statement does not use its influence to better society directly in the public discourse but may imply a willingness to engage more appropriately in a private setting.
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement does not utilize the platform to engage publicly on the issue, which could be seen as a missed opportunity to use the influence for public good.
[-1]