Reposted by Ilhan Omar
The statement by Judge Nicholas Parrillo regarding the non-guilty ruling for Brown University students involved in a sit-in protest addresses a significant public issue concerning the right to peaceful protest and the role of the judiciary in protecting civil liberties. The judge's comments emphasize the importance of nonviolent resistance and respect for peaceful protest in democratic societies.
- The judge's statement promotes understanding and compassion towards the protesters, recognizing their nonviolent approach. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By ruling in favor of the students and acknowledging their peaceful conduct, the judge respects the dignity of the protesters and upholds their right to express dissent. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement encourages a respectful and empathetic approach to handling protests, which can lead to more constructive societal dialogue. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The judge engages in constructive criticism of the opposing views from the city and university, advocating for a fair assessment of the protest. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The judge uses his influence to affirm the principles of justice and civil liberties, contributing positively to societal norms regarding protest and dissent. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.