Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement and linked content address the impact of AI on code quality, which is a topic of public interest, especially within the tech community. The discussion involves analysis of data and implications for the software development industry, making it a part of public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to inform and does not appear to cause harm through its words or actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on the topic without targeting individuals. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By sharing insights on AI's impact on code quality, the statement promotes understanding and potentially empathy among developers affected by these tools. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by presenting data on a relevant issue without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to inform the public about significant trends in technology, potentially leading to better informed decisions in tech development. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses the platform responsibly, presenting data-driven analysis to contribute to a broader conversation about technology's impact on work quality. [+1]