Robert Costa

Rank 10 of 47
|
Score 120

The statement reports on a legal proceeding, specifically focusing on the cross-examination of an individual named Cohen by someone named Blanche. It describes the nature of the questioning and Cohen's demeanor in response. This statement constitutes public discourse as it involves a report on a judicial process, which is a matter of public interest and contributes to civic dialogue by informing the public about the conduct and proceedings within a legal case.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm as it neutrally reports on a legal proceeding without any harmful language or implications. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the individuals involved by not disclosing sensitive personal information beyond what is relevant to the public's understanding of the legal proceedings. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by providing clear and concise information about the legal proceedings, helping the public understand the dynamics of the case. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive reporting without any personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing solely on the facts of the legal proceedings. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to better society by keeping the public informed about important legal proceedings, contributing to an informed citizenry. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech by responsibly reporting on a public legal case, using the platform to inform without bias or malice. [+1]