Reposted by Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
The statement discusses the adoption of Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in Utah and contrasts it with voter input policies in Louisiana. It provides information on public engagement and policy changes in different states, which are relevant to public governance and electoral systems.
- The statement does not contain harmful language or intentions, promoting an informative perspective on electoral processes. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing solely on public policy without targeting any individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By informing about electoral changes and encouraging feedback, the statement promotes understanding and engagement in civic processes. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement maintains a neutral tone and does not engage in personal attacks, focusing on policy differences between states. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to inform and engage the public on important electoral reforms, contributing positively to societal governance. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement responsibly uses the platform to discuss public policies, upholding the integrity of free speech. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.