The statement constitutes public discourse as it addresses a significant public issue involving freedom of speech and academic freedom in the context of a controversial international conflict. The statement discusses the cancellation of a scheduled presentation at the University of Amsterdam due to the speaker's political views, which directly engages with societal issues of censorship and debate within academic institutions.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, focusing instead on sharing a personal experience related to academic freedom. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, not engaging in any form of harassment or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- While the statement primarily shares a personal experience, it indirectly promotes understanding by highlighting issues of academic freedom and censorship. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on the issue of being deplatformed. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the speaker's influence to highlight and potentially correct issues related to academic freedom and censorship, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by using the platform to discuss and bring attention to issues of censorship in academia. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.