The statement is a critique of the perception of economics as a science and its implications on moral and ethical grounds. It engages in a substantive discussion on the societal impact of economic policies and theories, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement aims to highlight the potential harm in treating economics purely as a science, suggesting a need for moral consideration. It does not cause harm but seeks to prevent it by advocating for a more ethical approach to economics. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of others by advocating for a perspective on economics that considers its moral implications, potentially benefiting the less privileged. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By criticizing the moral neutrality of economics as a science, the statement promotes understanding and compassion for those affected by economic policies. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of a common viewpoint without personal attacks, focusing on the issue rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to encourage a reevaluation of economic theories, aiming for societal betterment by integrating ethical considerations. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement responsibly uses the platform to engage in free speech, contributing thoughtfully to public discourse on economics. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.