Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement is a summary of a journalistic investigation conducted by The New York Times, which addresses the issue of violence and terrorism against Palestinians by Jewish ultranationalists in the West Bank. The tone is serious and informative, aiming to shed light on a significant and ongoing public issue related to law, order, and human rights.
- The statement aims to inform and expose harmful actions without perpetuating harm itself, thus aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of those affected by the violence by bringing attention to their plight, thus upholding the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By highlighting the issue, the statement promotes understanding and empathy towards the Palestinians affected by the violence, aligning with the principle of using words to promote empathy and compassion. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement is part of a journalistic piece that invites dialogue and discussion on a contentious issue, thereby engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The investigation uses the influence of The New York Times to highlight critical human rights issues, aiming for societal betterment. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement uses the platform of a reputable publication responsibly, contributing to free speech and public discourse with integrity. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.