Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement addresses the impact of partisan media and congressional leadership on the quality and integrity of political discourse and governance. It critiques the prioritization of performance and outrage over substantive policy discussions, and the negative consequences this has on capable leaders in Congress.
- The statement implies harm caused by media and leadership behaviors but does not directly inflict harm with its words.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of individuals by critiquing systemic issues rather than targeting specific individuals with derogatory language. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks a direct promotion of understanding, empathy, or compassion, focusing more on criticism than on fostering positive discourse. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of criticism that, while harsh, does not resort to personal attacks but criticizes broader behaviors and trends. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to highlight issues that negatively impact society, suggesting a desire to use influence for societal betterment, albeit in a critical manner. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.