In reply to:
hyperborean maude flanders
@txnftxnf
·
612d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
612d
The statement is part of a conversation on Twitter discussing the capabilities and limitations of AI models like ChatGPT in understanding and playing games like chess and Othello. The discourse revolves around the scientific rigor and reliability of AI in replicating human understanding and strategy in structured games. This conversation engages with public issues related to technology, AI development, and its implications, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement aims to clarify and contribute factual information about AI capabilities, intending to inform rather than harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing solely on the topic without targeting any individual negatively. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By sharing insights about AI's limitations, the statement promotes a deeper understanding of AI technology. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a factual critique of AI models without resorting to personal attacks, maintaining a focus on the topic. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The discussion potentially guides future AI development and public understanding, aiming for societal betterment through informed discourse. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement uses the platform to share knowledge and engage in a responsible discussion about AI, upholding free speech and integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.