Joel Hellermark
@joelhellermark
·
613d
The statement is part of a public discourse as it engages in a substantive debate about the effectiveness and future of large language models (LLMs), a significant topic in the field of artificial intelligence. The discourse involves differing viewpoints on the approach to developing these technologies, which is a matter of public interest and technological policy.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm but could be seen as dismissive.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and does not engage in harassment or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks a tone of empathy and compassion, focusing more on critiquing opposing views. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but borders on personal attacks, referring to opposing views as 'nonsense.' [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to influence the discourse on AI development, though it could be more constructive.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.