Gary Marcus

The statement in question is part of a public discourse as it engages with a significant public issue concerning AI safety and corporate priorities. The conversation involves a discussion about the implications of a top researcher's resignation from OpenAI, which is a matter of public interest especially in the context of technological ethics and safety.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm but lacks depth in exploring the issue.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on the public actions of the individuals involved. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on confirming a point rather than exploring the broader implications.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in a form of dialogue but could be seen as somewhat confrontational rather than purely constructive.
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement indirectly uses influence by bringing attention to a significant issue, but it does not clearly advocate for betterment.
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement uses the platform to discuss a relevant issue responsibly but could improve in fostering a more informed and comprehensive dialogue. [+1]