Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement in question involves a public discourse as it engages with issues related to corporate governance, transparency, and trust within a significant technology company, OpenAI. The discourse touches upon the implications of internal disagreements and the broader impact on AI safety and corporate ethics. The tone appears to be one of frustration and concern, highlighting issues of communication and trust within the organization.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not seem to intend harm but expresses a personal grievance and a broader concern, which could indirectly harm reputations if not substantiated.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy in that it does not disclose sensitive personal information, but it does discuss internal company matters publicly, which could be seen as a borderline violation. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to raise awareness about potential issues within OpenAI, which could promote understanding among the public about the challenges in AI safety and corporate governance. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of criticism but does so by mentioning a personal blocking incident, which could detract from constructive dialogue.
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the platform to highlight important issues regarding AI safety and corporate trust, aiming for betterment in corporate practices. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The use of the platform is responsible in raising issues of public concern but could be seen as lacking in integrity if the personal grievance is perceived as overshadowing the broader issues.