Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83
Abhijit Mahabal
@amahabal
·
613d
@GaryMarcus Similarly with chess moves. “Chess move” it learns, but even the category “legal chess move” stumps it, as shown by this amazing video https://www.reddit.com/r/Anarchy… of ChatGPT playing Stockfish, where it appears unconstrained by legality, happy even to take its own material. 5/n
5/17/2024, 11:59:01 PM
X

The statement is part of a broader conversation on Twitter discussing the limitations of language models like ChatGPT in understanding and applying specific categories within broader contexts, such as legal chess moves. The tone is somewhat critical but primarily informative, aiming to highlight a specific deficiency in the AI's performance. The content directly addresses issues related to AI technology, which is a significant public concern, especially regarding the capabilities and limitations of AI systems in understanding complex rules and contexts.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm as it merely points out a factual limitation in AI performance. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing solely on the AI's capabilities without targeting any individuals or groups. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by shedding light on a specific aspect of AI technology, potentially increasing public awareness and knowledge. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out a flaw in AI understanding without demeaning language or personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to better society by contributing to an informed discussion about AI capabilities, which is crucial for technological literacy and policy-making. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech responsibly, using the platform to share factual observations and engage in public discourse on AI technology. [+1]