In reply to:
Ralph Stefan Weir
@RalphStefanWeir
·
614d
The statement by @RalphStefanWeir is a technical clarification in a discussion about cognitive errors and their relevance to the development of artificial general intelligence (AGI). It corrects a misunderstanding about the nature of a specific cognitive error (perseveration/set effect) and its applicability to the scenario described by another user. The statement is factual and contributes to a clearer understanding of the topic.
- The statement aims to clarify a misunderstanding without causing harm or spreading misinformation. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the dignity of others by providing factual information without any derogatory or disrespectful language. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by correcting a misconception, thereby fostering more informed dialogue. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- It acknowledges a potential error in the application of a cognitive concept, helping to correct the course of the discussion. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- By contributing factual and relevant information, the statement uses its influence to improve the quality of the discussion, which is beneficial to society's understanding of AGI. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.