Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
5/18/2024, 7:21:34 PM
X
In reply to:
.
@zjQM4ff6hF69744
·
617d
@GaryMarcus I’m ngl you have become notorious for how often you are wrong in AI circles. Maybe sit this one out and you can run victory laps after your described plateau arrives.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
617d
Hyped-up “influencer” thread on GPT-4o with 4 million views that made me cringe.

Demos aren’t products.

And, seriously, Breakout as the programming demo? There are a zillion examples of that already on the web, complete with source code, videos, explanations, etc.

Show me…
Rowan Cheung
@rowancheung
·
618d
It’s only been 2 days since OpenAI revealed GPT-4o.

Users are uncovering incredible capabilities that completely change how we use and interact with AI.

The 12 most impressive use cases so far:

The statement engages in a discussion about the accuracy and credibility of claims made by individuals in the context of AI technology, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is somewhat defensive and aims to clarify the importance of providing evidence when accusing someone of being wrong.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but could be seen as defensive. It neither significantly upholds nor violates this principle.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains a neutral tone and focuses on the importance of evidence. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by emphasizing the need for evidence when making accusations, which can foster a more informed and empathetic dialogue. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement encourages constructive criticism by suggesting that accusations should be backed by examples, thus avoiding personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]