Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement humorously critiques the current direction of AI development, suggesting that AI should be used to handle mundane tasks to free up time for creative pursuits. It engages in public discourse by addressing the societal implications of AI technology.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and is light-hearted in nature, aiming to provoke thought rather than offend. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting a common frustration with the current use of AI, encouraging a shift in perspective. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI development priorities without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]