Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement criticizes the actions of the Broward Sheriff's Office during the Parkland shooting, highlighting perceived failures and inaction. The tone is accusatory and critical, aiming to hold the deputies accountable for their response. The accompanying image from a news article adds context to the criticism by showing a deputy who was found not guilty and is now seeking legal fee reimbursement.
- The statement aims to hold law enforcement accountable, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by advocating for better safety measures. However, the accusatory tone and use of the term 'Coward of Broward' could be seen as harmful and disrespectful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of the deputies involved, particularly by using derogatory language. This could be seen as a form of public shaming. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It focuses on blame and criticism rather than constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses personal attacks and derogatory language, which detracts from a productive discussion. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to bring attention to perceived failures in law enforcement, which can be seen as an attempt to better society by advocating for accountability. However, the manner in which it does so is not entirely responsible or respectful. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.