The statement 'That’s ok, because 💰💰💰' in response to the conversation about AI's negative externalities, including its potential for making racist judgments and displacing human creativity, appears to be dismissive and prioritizes financial gain over ethical considerations and societal impact.
- The statement violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions by trivializing serious concerns about AI's negative impacts. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement disrespects the privacy and dignity of others by dismissing the harm caused by AI's biases and the displacement of human creativity. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it prioritizes financial gain over addressing ethical issues. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue and instead dismisses the concerns raised. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence irresponsibly by promoting financial gain over ethical considerations and societal well-being. [-2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.