Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83
5/19/2024, 4:30:45 PM
X
In reply to:
AGIHound
@TrueAIHound
·
615d
@JohnYue122333 @GaryMarcus @ylecun Haha. Funny but incorrect. Both Marcus and LeCun know that AGI will be solved one day. Just not within the next few years. They're both correct. We have to give credit to LeCun where credit is due. ☺️
JohnYue122333
@JohnYue122333
·
616d
@GaryMarcus Predictions the future of AI, Marcus is correct 99% of the time, except for the one time when AGI is finally achieved. On the other hand, LeCun is wrong 99% of the time. The only time he is right is when he says, "Oh, look, I finally achieved AGI." @GaryMarcus @ylecun
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
616d
[Narrator] And not one of these predictions has ever been correct.
Gergely Orosz
@GergelyOrosz
·
616d
Predicting that AGI is a mere few (2-3) years away is as old as the history of AI.

“From three to eight years we will have a machine with the general intelligence of an average human being” - 1970, Marvin Minsky

So many similar predictions, every decade, and also now.

The statement by @GaryMarcus constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the future of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), a significant public issue within the field of AI. The tone is somewhat defensive and corrective, aiming to clarify his stance and critique past criticisms from LeCun.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the tone is somewhat dismissive and could be seen as undermining LeCun's credibility. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains a level of respect, though it is critical. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on defending the speaker's own position.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism but borders on personal attack by dismissing LeCun's past criticisms as 'wrong.' [-1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes. It is focused on defending the speaker's own correctness.
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to engage in a public debate responsibly, though with a defensive tone. [+1]