Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47

Score 83

@astralmatrix which negative externalities are you and others in your movement concerned about?

when I have asked before, not one e/acc has listed a single negative externality that would make them hesitate, even in principle.

5/19/2024, 4:43:37 PM

In reply to:

Andrew — e/acc

@astralmatrix

616d

@GaryMarcus we care Gary, we just don't agree on the risks of AI.
we want positive outcomes and if we encounter problems with AI they will be handled and solved in turn when they arise.

we are not so different my friend.

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

616d

Accelerationists are completely indifferent to the many negative externalities of AI, both current and future.

So many people in so many areas of life will be affected, and the accelerationists just don’t care.

Craig Laurance Gidney

@ethereallad

616d

@GaryMarcus A lot of short fiction markets are being flooded with AI submissions. Writing is a craft and an art.

The statement by @astralmatrix engages in public discourse by addressing concerns about the negative externalities of AI, a significant societal issue. The tone is inquisitive and seeks clarification, aiming to foster understanding and dialogue.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement strives to do no harm by asking a question rather than making an accusation, promoting a respectful dialogue. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding and empathy by seeking to understand the concerns of others in the movement. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism and dialogue by asking for specific examples of negative externalities, avoiding personal attacks. [+1]