Julie Kelly 🇺🇸
@julie_kelly2
·
586d
The statement expresses a strong opinion on perceived disparities in the justice system in the United States, comparing the treatment of different groups and individuals. It suggests that there is a double standard in how justice is administered and calls for action to address this perceived injustice.
- The statement uses strong language ('disgusting') which could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm by escalating tensions. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make broad generalizations about groups and individuals, which could be seen as disrespectful to their privacy and dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it emphasizes division and perceived injustice without offering a constructive path forward. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes accusatory claims without providing evidence or engaging with opposing viewpoints, which could be seen as a form of personal attack or ad hominem argument. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight a perceived societal issue, which aligns with the principle of using influence for the betterment of society. However, the manner in which it does so could be more constructive. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.