In reply to:
Geoffrey Miller
@primalpoly
·
616d
🚨 Katherine Brodsky
@mysteriouskat
·
616d
The statement engages in a discussion about the success rates of different types of relationships, which is a public issue related to social norms and personal relationships. The tone is inquisitive and skeptical, aiming to clarify and question the validity of the statistics presented.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a neutral inquiry into the validity of a statistic. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by questioning the data and seeking clarification, which can lead to a more informed discussion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by questioning the data without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by engaging in a factual and respectful manner. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.