Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant public issue, namely the legal proceedings involving a former president and the actions of a Special Counsel. The tone is factual and informative, aiming to update the public on a judicial decision and its implications.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It reports on a judicial decision without inflammatory language. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of those involved by focusing on the actions of public officials and the legal process rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing a link to the court document, allowing readers to access the primary source and form their own opinions. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It reports on the judge's comments and the actions of the Special Counsel's office in a neutral manner. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by providing factual information and a source for further reading. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.