The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the transparency and accountability of a social media platform's algorithm, which is a significant public issue. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting that the platform's leadership is not being truthful about their claims. The statement also tags another user, potentially to draw attention to the issue or to seek validation.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it accuses someone of lying without definitive proof, which could be harmful. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it directly accuses an individual of dishonesty. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is accusatory and dismissive. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it resorts to personal attacks rather than focusing on the issue at hand. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes, as it is a direct accusation without room for correction.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses its influence to highlight a potential issue with societal implications, which could be seen as an attempt to better society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech but does so in a manner that lacks responsibility and integrity. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.