Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement and linked content engage in public discourse by discussing the implications and future of artificial intelligence, a significant societal issue. The tone is analytical and cautionary, aiming to provide a realistic perspective on the progress and challenges in AI development.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by providing a realistic assessment of AI progress, potentially preventing overhyped expectations and encouraging responsible development. [+2]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by discussing the complexities and challenges in AI, fostering a more informed public dialogue. [+2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by comparing OpenAI to WeWork, highlighting potential pitfalls without resorting to personal attacks. [+2]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the platform to better society by encouraging a more measured and thoughtful approach to AI development and investment. [+2]