Reposted by Jake Tapper
NATO Spokesperson Farah Dakhlallah
@NATOpress
·
553d
The statement by the former NATO Assistant Secretary General constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically a tweet from an official NATO account that addresses a significant international event. The tone of the statement is one of shock and disapproval, indicating that the tweet is seen as inappropriate.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but expresses concern over the appropriateness of the original tweet, which could be seen as harmful or insensitive.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on the inappropriateness of the tweet rather than attacking individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it implies a call for more appropriate and respectful communication.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out the inappropriateness of the tweet without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to call out what is perceived as an inappropriate message from an official account. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.