Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement engages with a public issue, specifically the future of OpenAI and the AI industry, and thus constitutes public discourse.
- The statement uses strong language like 'bullshitters' and 'scam,' which could be considered harmful and inflammatory, violating the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement refers to individuals at OpenAI as 'bullshitters,' which can be seen as disrespectful and potentially defamatory, violating the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses derogatory language and makes strong accusations without providing constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in personal attacks by calling individuals 'bullshitters' and does not offer constructive criticism or dialogue, violating the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and avoiding personal attacks. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- While the statement exercises free speech, it does so in a manner that lacks responsibility and integrity, given the use of derogatory language and unsubstantiated claims. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.