Reposted by Vivek Ramaswamy
The statement criticizes Harvard University's decision to appoint Claudine Gay as its president, suggesting that the decision was based on her support for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs rather than her academic credentials. It also mentions allegations of plagiarism against her, implying that Harvard's priorities are misplaced.
- The statement could be seen as harmful to Claudine Gay's reputation by suggesting she is unqualified and has committed plagiarism, which may not be substantiated. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of Claudine Gay by publicly discussing unverified allegations of plagiarism. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is critical and accusatory. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes personal attacks on Claudine Gay's qualifications and character. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to criticize Harvard's decision-making, which could be seen as an attempt to influence public opinion on the importance of DEI versus academic rigor. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or uphold integrity, given the personal attacks and unverified allegations. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.