Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement and the conversation it refers to engage in public discourse by discussing the future of artificial intelligence (AI), a significant societal issue. The tone is analytical and critical, aiming to provide a balanced view on the progress and challenges in AI development.
- The statement and conversation strive to do no harm by providing a balanced and critical perspective on AI, which is important for informed public discourse. This adherence is positive. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by acknowledging the complexities and challenges in AI development, encouraging a more nuanced view of the technology's future. This adherence is positive. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by comparing OpenAI to WeWork, suggesting potential pitfalls without resorting to personal attacks. This adherence is positive. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to contribute to the betterment of society by fostering a more informed and critical discussion about AI, which is crucial for societal progress. This adherence is positive. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.