The statement criticizes OpenAI for perceived dishonesty and lack of transparency, suggesting that the company has misled the public on multiple occasions. The tone is accusatory and skeptical, reflecting frustration and distrust. The statement engages in public discourse by addressing issues related to corporate transparency and accountability.
- The statement does not directly harm individuals but could contribute to a negative perception of OpenAI. It does not promote understanding or empathy. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but does not uphold dignity, as it uses strong language ('fools') that could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not do so constructively. It uses strong language and does not offer a solution or constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes. It is purely critical.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses influence to call out perceived issues with OpenAI, which could be seen as an attempt to hold the company accountable. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity due to its accusatory tone.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.