In reply to:
Olivia P. Walker
@olivia_p_walker
·
618d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
618d
The statement by @olivia_p_walker constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue concerning the ethical implications of using voice actors in AI systems and the potential misuse of a celebrity's likeness. The statement seeks to understand the concerns raised by others, indicating a willingness to engage in constructive dialogue.
- The statement by @olivia_p_walker does not cause harm and seeks to understand the issue, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by asking for clarification on why the issue is considered problematic, which aligns with the principle of using words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by asking for an explanation rather than making personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, which aligns with the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.