In reply to:
DJ Bracken
@dj_bracken
·
619d
The statement by @dj_bracken is part of a public discourse as it engages with a public issue concerning the ethical implications of AI technology and the use of a celebrity's likeness without consent. The statement aims to provide a source for the claims made in the conversation, which is crucial for informed public dialogue.
- The statement strives to do no harm by providing a source to verify the claims, which is essential for transparency and trust in public discourse. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It simply provides a source for verification. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By providing a source, the statement promotes understanding and empathy, as it helps clarify the situation and supports informed discussion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the need for a source, which is a valid and respectful way to engage in public discourse. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to better the conversation by contributing to the verification of information, which is crucial for the integrity of public dialogue. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.