The statement expresses a desire for a 'guilty' verdict for Michael Cohen, referencing his admission of stealing $30k from the Trump Organization. The tone is somewhat sarcastic and anticipatory of a specific legal outcome.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a desire for a specific legal outcome, which could be seen as prejudicial. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does touch on the dignity of Michael Cohen by presuming guilt. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it leans towards a personal attack by presuming guilt without a fair trial. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be entirely responsible or with integrity, as it presumes guilt before a legal verdict. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.