Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 83
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
619d
The Board needs to clean house and return to the mission.
5/21/2024, 5:53:17 AM
X
In reply to:
Olivia P. Walker
@olivia_p_walker
·
619d
@GaryMarcus so considering how you feel, what do you want to see happen next? Or what does all of this tell you needs to be done? How would you like all of this to end?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
619d
Speaking of lack of candor:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
619d
Unbelievable. From Ms Publicly Available Sources.

I have 100% lost faith in the entire company.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
620d
The OpenAI board was right. Even on little things, Sam is not consistently candid.

Earlier today OpenAI said the resemblance to ScarJo was a “coincidence”.

It was not:
Bobby Allyn
@BobbyAllyn
·
620d
Statement from Scarlett Johansson on the OpenAI situation. Wow:

The statement '@olivia_p_walker What should happen next:' is a direct engagement in a public discourse about the ethical and legal implications of AI technology, specifically regarding the use of a voice that closely resembles a well-known public figure without their consent. The conversation touches on issues of transparency, consent, and the ethical use of AI, which are significant public concerns.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and seeks to understand the next steps in addressing the issue, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by seeking clarity on what actions should be taken next, which can lead to a more informed and compassionate response. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement encourages constructive dialogue by asking for opinions on the next steps, rather than making personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the platform to engage in a discussion that could lead to better societal outcomes, such as improved transparency and ethical standards in AI technology. [+1]