Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement 'It was never intended to resemble hers' followed by laughing and eye-rolling emojis is dismissive and sarcastic in tone. It appears to mock the seriousness of the controversy regarding the voice resemblance to Scarlett Johansson. The original statement from Sam Altman is a formal response addressing the issue respectfully and apologetically.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The dismissive tone and use of emojis can be seen as harmful, as it trivializes the concerns raised by Scarlett Johansson and others involved in the controversy. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The sarcastic response does not respect the privacy and dignity of Scarlett Johansson, as it mocks the situation rather than addressing it constructively. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it undermines the respectful tone of the original statement from Sam Altman. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The sarcastic tone does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It instead resorts to mockery, which can be seen as a form of personal attack. [-2]